Arbetar du inom hälso- och sjukvård?

Informationen på denna webbplats är avsedd för hälso- och sjukvårdspersonal i Sverige. Är du hälso- och sjukvårdspersonal kan du svara ja för att komma vidare till sidan. Svarar du nej kommer du till vår sida för allmänheten.


Ja Nej

Lämnar Chiesis webbplats...

Chiesi ansvarar inte för information på externa webbplatser.

Vill du fortsätta till extern webbplats?

Ja Nej

The ability to monitor certain aspects of patients’ health from their home has become an increasingly popular telehealth option that have been accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic1. Generally, telehealth spans from simple video calls between patients and doctors replacing routine visits to complex remote monitoring of general health or specific disease related parameters. Interestingly, telehealth as such have been shown to cut down on patients’ travel costs2 and infection risk at hospitals or in the GPs office3. But the overall health benefits are debated and a recent review of 29 studies utilizing remote monitoring in COPD care concluded that no important benefits for patients were obtained, neither looking at symptoms nor quality of life4. However, people who were monitored through telehealth technology and usual care had some reduction in risk of hospital re-admission4.

In COPD and asthma care, remote monitoring can largely be categorized based on the purpose of the monitoring:

  1. To predict or foresee flare ups by collecting health and disease parameters. This kind of monitoring is usually associated with simple monitoring such as QoL questionaries and health parameters as body temperature which is report digitally and monitored by nurses or potentially AI.
  2. To improve patient awareness of changes in symptoms by recording in digital diaries or mobile applications and thus realize potential triggers, which may lead to improved self-management.
  3. To improve care by increasing treatment adherence and or compliance, which usually involves the use of smart inhalers or add-on modules in connection with a mobile application displaying the data for the patient.

Despite the development of various digital tools such as mobile applications, smart inhalers, and smart add-on modules, a general implementation of these remains a challenge due to complexities in the use and the relative high cost that patients are reluctant to pay5. The cost related to remote monitoring and associated increased workload of analysing reports need to be studied to show that the use of these is cost effective, providing better disease control and improved quality of life for patients5.

Thus, having the purpose in mind when trying to identify patients where remote monitoring can add value seems to be key –when it comes to remote monitoring of patients there is no one size fits all!

Nicolai Krogh
Medical Science Liaison


  1. Shilpa N. Gajarawala and Jessica N. Pelkowski. Telehealth Benefits and Barriers. The Journal for Nurse Practitioners 17 (2021) 218-221.
  2. Centaine L Snoswell, Monica L Taylor, Tracy A Comans, Anthony C Smith, Leonard C Gray, and Liam J Caffery. Determining if Telehealth Can Reduce Health System Costs: Scoping Review. J Med Internet Res. 2020 Oct; 22(10): e17298.
  3. Mai Tsutsui, Firoozeh Gerayeli, and Don D Sin. Pulmonary Rehabilitation in a Post-COVID-19 World: Telerehabilitation as a New Standard in Patients with COPD. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2021 Feb 19;16:379-391.
  4. Janjua S, Carter D, Threapleton CJD, Prigmore S, Disler RT. Telehealth interventions: remote monitoring and consultations for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2021, Issue 7. Art. No.: CD013196.
  5. Henry Chrystyn, Raphaele Audibert, Manfred Keller, et al. Real-life inhaler adherence and technique: Time to get smarter! Respir Med. 2019 Oct-Nov;158:24-32.